Scoring Sheet for Senior Design Project Posters and Papers
Items in Red are Mandatory
Items in [] are ABET criteria indicated
|
1 |
Engineering goals |
__/20 |
|
Problem Statement: clear problem definition (identify constraints & alternatives), definition based on customer requirements (demands & wishes) [c] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Prototype, test and/or prediction of performance: manufacturability; proof of concept; prototype can be a database which is established or revised. [c,k] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Documentation of problem solution: feasibility analyses (if no prototype); validation and verification (meets customer demands and industry standards) [c] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Safety, Health & Risk Analysis: safety & risk analysis; demonstration of appropriate mathematical analyses; environmental impact [4] |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Economic/market consideration: Can it be made? Can people afford it? What is the number of potential users? Mathematical analyses of what type of device you’re aiming toward; what’s the market? [4] |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
2 |
Creative ability |
__/20 |
|
Approach: logical analysis, consideration of alternatives; example of generation of ideas, ideation and innovation [e] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Originality: new, non-obvious, a contribution to the body of engineering knowledge; |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
3 |
Thoroughness |
__/20 |
|
Documentation of effort: e.g., project notebook; Innovation Work Bench; Design history file, … [e,4] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Literature review & Patent search, References: primary sources; patents…[j,k,h,i] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Application of Standards (if applicable, depends on type of project): relevant standards cited, e.g., FDA regulations, ISO9000, etc.[e,4] |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
4 |
Overall Competence in Design |
__/25 |
|
Proper application of modern engineering techniques, skills and tools to problem [e,k,c,b] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Demonstrated ability to design system, component or process [c,k] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Problem scope: Design difficulty (e.g., open- v. closed-ended problem), magnitude of design challenge; is the problem trivial or not? [i,a] |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
5 |
Clarity of presentation |
__/10 |
|
Engineering layout: easy to read, mix of text and pictures[g] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Well-written: is it a stand alone summary? Convincing evidence of solution’s quality; links findings to project statement?[g] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Overall impact: overall communication; convincing that this is a good solution[g] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
Evidence of teamwork: can the evaluator have a substantive exchange about the project with each team member?[d] |
E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
|
6 |
Ethical/Societal/Political considerations: |
__/5 |
|
Ethical/Societal/Political considerations: Is anyone being excluded? Ethical treatment of subjects (human and animal)?[4,f] |
F E-- E- E E+ E++ |
|
F indicates failure, E-- indicates performance way below expectations, E- below expectations, E at expectations, E+ above expectations, and E++ indicates superior performance.
Nomination for design award? Circle one: Yes No