Scoring Sheet for Senior Design Project Posters and Papers
Items in Red are Mandatory, please give a numerical grade on each of the six major areas, please circle your estimates on the sub-areas.
Project team name:______________________________________________________
|
1 |
Engineering goals |
__/20 |
|
Problem Statement: clear problem definition (identify constraints & alternatives), definition based on customer requirements (demands & wishes) |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Prototype, test and/or prediction of performance: manufacturability; proof of concept; prototype can be a database which is established or revised. |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Documentation of problem solution: feasibility analyses (if no prototype); validation and verification (meets customer demands and industry standards) |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Safety, Health & Risk Analysis: safety & risk analysis; demonstration of appropriate mathematical analyses; environmental impact |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
Economic/market consideration: Can it be made? Can people afford it? What is the number of potential users? Mathematical analyses if necessary. Market survey? |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
2 |
Creative ability |
__/20 |
|
Approach: logical analysis, consideration of alternatives; example of generation of ideas, ideation and innovation |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Originality: new, non-obvious, a contribution to the body of engineering knowledge; |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
3 |
Thoroughness |
__/20 |
|
Documentation of effort: e.g., project notebook; Innovation Work Bench; Design file, etc. |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Literature review & Patent search, References: primary sources; patents… |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Application of Standards (if applicable): relevant standards cited, e.g., FDA,, ISO, etc. |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
4 |
Overall Competence in Design |
__/25 |
|
Proper application of modern engineering techniques, skills and tools to problem |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Demonstrated ability to design system, component or process |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Problem scope: Design difficulty (e.g., open- v. closed-ended problem), magnitude of design challenge; is the problem trivial or not? |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
5 |
Clarity of presentation |
__/10 |
|
Engineering layout: easy to read, mix of text and pictures |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Well-written: is it a stand alone summary? Convincing evidence of solution’s quality; links findings to project statement? |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Overall impact: overall communication; convincing that this is a good solution |
F E- E E+ |
|
|
Evidence of teamwork: can the evaluator have a substantive exchange about the project with each team member? |
na E- E E+ |
|
|
6 |
Ethical/Societal/Political considerations: |
__/5 |
|
Ethical/Societal/Political considerations: Is anyone being excluded? Ethical treatment of subjects (human and animal)? |
F E- E E+ |
|
F indicates failure (< 60%), na indicates not applicable, E- indicates performance below expectations (< 80%), E at expectations (85 +/- 5%), E+ above expectations (95 +/- 5%)
Judge name:
________________ Nomination for design award? Circle one: Yes No
Nomination
for design award? Circle one: Yes No